“There is an intelligence that is training us. Perhaps we are like children who have forgotten how to speak the language we once knew.” — Philip K. Dick, Exegesis (fragment, compiled by Pamela Jackson)
We’ve spent 80 years chasing spacecraft. Maybe we should be studying consciousness instead.
The New Disclosure Narrative (Same Story, New Wrapping)
The newly released documentary The Age of Disclosure (2025) claims to reveal an 80-year global cover-up of non-human technology, featuring testimony from military insiders and intelligence officials. The focus is familiar: crash retrievals, exotic propulsion, underground programs, and governments racing to reverse-engineer alien tech.
It’s compelling. It feels groundbreaking.
But it closely mirrors earlier, respected investigative works, like Leslie Kean’s UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On the Record, which also privileges radar data, credible witnesses, and evidence of exotic craft.
Different decade, same narrative.
The Public is Stuck in a Materialist Loop
For generations, we’ve been told, if we could just get the wreckage, we’d finally understand. Yet after decades of leaks, hearings, whistleblowers, and FOIA disclosures, the “truth” hasn’t moved much. Instead, we keep circling back to the same premise: the answer lies in the technology.
Meanwhile, experiencers have been describing a different angle entirely — one that doesn’t fit into hangars or congressional hearings.
The Real Action Is in Human Consciousness
If you talk to long-term experiencers, people whose encounters span decades, patterns emerge that don’t look like aerospace mysteries. They look like developmental, psychological, metaphysical, and possibly interdimensional interaction.
Examples:
- John Foster – multi-decade staged encounters, memory manipulation, “teaching episodes”
- Whitley Strieber – emotional conditioning, telepathy, non-linear time experiences
- Karla Turner – MILAB / NHI overlap, multi-generational influence, covert monitoring
- Dolores Cannon’s subjects – pre-birth agreements, soul-level missions, multi-lifetime contact
- Sid Padrick (1965) – contact framed around spiritual and societal messaging, not tech
These cases have nothing to do with propulsion. They’re about relationship, curriculum, influence, and evolution.
And that brings us to a key figure often erased from mainstream disclosure: Dr. Andrija Puharich (1918–1995), physician, inventor, Army researcher, parapsychology pioneer, and intelligence-adjacent scientist, conducted controlled experiments with alleged contact phenomena decades before today’s whistleblower era.
His subjects (including Uri Geller) reported:
- channeled communication
- contact with discarnate or extradimensional intelligences
- telepathic group transmissions
- reality manipulation during altered states
- technological influence communicated through metaphysical means
Puharich concluded that the phenomenon is as much informational and consciousness-based as it is technological. His work touched classified institutions, military circles, and intelligence agencies, not because he could chase UFOs, but because he could measure telepathy in a lab.
That kind of data is far more disruptive than a crashed craft — and far harder to disclose.
Another important contributor to consciousness research who also interacted with UFO intelligence is Ingo Swann (1933 – 2013). Not a pilot. Not a whistleblower. But a psychic researcher working under classified conditions at SRI. YouTube – Ingo’s Presentation for A.R.E.
Swann’s work demonstrated that intelligence agencies were not just studying UFOs as aircraft — they were studying the human mind as a sensing instrument capable of interacting with non-human intelligence.
Ingo knew there were two levels of research — what the public is allowed to see and what governments pursue because they know the phenomenon is real — paraphrased from Penetration (1998)
And that distinction is the crux of the modern disclosure dilemma: The public is given craft. The classified world studies consciousness.
Technology is a distraction.
Human perception is the asset.
If the government only cared about craft, why did they spend decades surveilling experiencers rather than crash sites, funding remote viewing programs instead of aerospace labs, recruiting psychic subjects through intel channels, infiltrating contact groups, not engineering departments?
Because the sensitive data isn’t in the metal. It’s in the humans who interact with the phenomenon.
Here’s the pivot:
| What We’re Told Matters | What the Data Actually Points To |
|---|---|
| propulsion | consciousness interaction |
| alloys | memory alteration & psi effects |
| sensor data | interdimensional access |
| crash sites | lifelong, curated contact with individuals |
We may not just be observing the phenomenon. We may be participants in something structured.
The Real Threat to Disclosure: Aging Witnesses
The experiencers who hold the most integrative data, those with: multi-decade contact, staged experiences, telepathic or altered-state interaction, and entities operating outside physical visibility…are in their 60s, 70s, and 80s.
When they’re gone, we’ll be left with radar logs, military testimony, classified programs, and craft, craft, craft. The metaphysical narrative will vanish by attrition. And that may be the ultimate cover-up, done quietly, by time.
🐾 The Cat and the Tail
We’re stuck in a loop. Chasing physical evidence. Ignoring experiential evidence. Waiting for the government to confirm what experiencers already know.
It looks like inquiry,
feels like progress,
but it’s a closed orbit.
The tail moves.
We chase.
The body goes nowhere.
Meanwhile, the phenomenon continues operating on layers we still refuse to acknowledge.
The Shift We Need Now
Instead of asking: What crashed?
We need to be asking: What is interacting with human consciousness, and why?
Instead of: Where are they from?
Ask: What is the structure of reality that allows them here?
Instead of: How can we shoot them down?
Ask: How do they access us when they aren’t physically present?
This is the shift from hardware to ontology. Disclosure won’t happen in a hangar. It will happen in our model of reality.
If We Stop Chasing the Tail…
We may finally recognize contact is not a visitation. it is not observational or random. And it is not separate from our development. It may be a relational, co-creative, multi-lifetime engagement, one where the human side is a participant, not an observer.
That perspective cannot be declassified. It must be remembered.
And the clock is ticking.
Conscious Living & Wendy's Coffeehouse 